Acacia Mining has analysed the summary findings published and would make the following observations:
- Based on more than 20 years of data available to it – which it will make available for any further analysis – Acacia Mining cannot reconcile these with the findings of the committee
- This historical data has been compiled and analysed by Tanzanian and international experts and organisations, with consistent results
- This independently verified data has consistently shown the gold content of the concentrates is less than one tenth of the committee’s findings
- If the committee’s published findings were based on accurate data, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi would be the world’s two largest gold producers
- Given the magnitude of this discrepancy Acacia Mining believes there should be an independent review of the content of the concentrates.
In addition, Acacia Mining will make further detailed observations once it receives the committee’s full report.
In the meantime, it would make the following points on the committee’s findings:
Gold content in concentrate
Acacia Mining’s verified data shows that the 277 containers at Dar Es Salaam port contain 26 000 oz of gold in total. Each of these containers contain on average around 3 kg (around 100 oz) of gold, 3 kg of silver and 3 000 kg of copper.
The committee’s findings were that the gold content of these containers, which represent one month’s production, totalled 7.8 t (or 250 000 oz). In 2016, Acacia Mining produced and sold 250 000 oz of gold in concentrate from these two mines in the whole of the year.
The committee’s findings imply that Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi each produce more than 1.5 Moz of gold per year.
This would mean they are the two largest gold producers in the world; that Acacia Mining is the world’s third largest gold producer; and that Acacia Mining produces more gold from just three mines than companies like AngloGold Ashanti produce from 19 mines, Goldcorp from 11 mines, and Kinross from their 9 mines.
Gold production declared
Acacia Mining’s declarations of gold production and sales revenues exactly match the gold and silver ounces and copper tons that Acacia Mining businesses produce, sell and declare.
Acacia Mining’s production and financial statements and figures are all fully audited, and demonstrate that Acacia Mining does not benefit from the extra gold (10 times more gold) that the committee’s findings imply Acacia Mining has not declared.
Royalties on other minerals
Under Tanzanian law and our agreements with the government, Tanzania receives royalties of 4% of the gold, silver and copper contained in the concentrates.
Acacia Mining has always paid the royalty due to government and there is a robust audit trail to demonstrate this.
Whilst there are other minerals contained in the concentrates, including iron, sulphur, rhodium among others, these are not of commercially viable quantities and Acacia Mining receives no revenues for them and no royalty is payable to Tanzania.
Historic production and revenues
Acacia Mining is a listed public company with hundreds of shareholders, our financial, production and gold reserve records are audited to international standards by many independent auditors, and we must comply with government oversight agencies in Tanzania, UK, Canada, and in the United States.
These international regulatory agencies are independent and take their responsibilities seriously, and can impose heavy penalties on companies who do not report their production and financial results accurately.
As a result, it would not be possible for Acacia Mining to under-report its gold reserves, its gold production and its revenues even for a short period of time, let alone over many years.
Acacia Mining does not understand how the committee could reach these findings without consulting with these independent auditors and regulatory agencies.
If the committee’s findings were accurate, and Buzwagi produces and sells ten times more gold than it declares, Acacia Mining would be extending mining at Buzwagi for many years.
The reality is that Buzwagi is a low grade mine and is running out of commercially viable gold.
Accuracy of historical testing
Since 1977, more than 215 000 drill samples have been taken by Tanzanian geological teams just at Bulyanhulu, for many different exploration and mining companies and analysed and verified by testing laboratories in Tanzania and overseas.
None of the findings made by these companies based on the analysis of these more than 215 000 drill samples are consistent with the committee’s findings based on its samples from around 44 of the 277 containers of concentrates at the Port of Dar es Salaam.
If the committee’s findings are accurate, the many different companies, geological teams and testing laboratories involved at Bulyanhulu since 1977 and at Buzwagi since the 1990s have failed to properly sample, test and report on the grades of gold in the ground, and their gold/copper/silver production over these periods.
It would be impossible for all of these audited companies to under report gold reserves and production so significantly even for a short period of time, let alone over many years.
In conclusion, Acacia Mining does not understand the findings of the committee and believe that they contain significant discrepancies compared to all previous data analysed.
The company pays all applicable royalties on all of the payable minerals that we produce. Acacia Mining’s exporting of the concentrate takes place in full compliance with Tanzanian law and the legal agreements that we have with the Tanzanian Government.
At Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi, the combined direct impact of the ban on our exports of concentrates is the average daily loss of revenues of more than US$1 million. As a result, we are considering all of our options.
Feature image credit: Acacia Mining
(Activities at Acacia Mining’s Buzwagi mine in Tanzania)