HomeESGTheft resistant energy meters

Theft resistant energy meters

Theft resistant energy meters

All honest consumers would like other users to pay for their fair share of electricity too, so that quality of distribution can improve. With the advent of electronic energy meters, utilities have a wide selection of approaches to combat theft on their grids. The breadth of selection depends upon the existing infrastructure and investment capital available.

Fig 1: Proper Connection

The most robust and technically superior solution would approach the elusive goal of a tamper-proof meter. This elegant solution would monitor every energy meter remotely and capture an energy consumption reading every 15 or 30 minutes. Usage patterns could be monitored and abnormalities detected. A decision could be made to discontinue service remotely. Potential lost revenue from consumer misuse is eliminated quickly and the likelihood of corruption is significantly curtailed.

The success of an automatic meter reading solution relies on utilities being willing to take the risk of investing in a communications network and a data management infrastructure. The return on investment of such an installation, complicated by political agendas, is difficult to justify before a real life testimonial can be used as an example. Based on risk and the economic environment, utilities in developing countries are forced to adopt a low cost approach instead of a technically superior solution.

Fig2: Improper Connection Billed Incorrectly

Most of the electricity in developing countries is distributed on two wire, single phase. The functional equivalent to the electromechanical meter is an electronic energy meter that measures current in the phase wire. An example of the typical connection on a standard electronic energy meter used for two wire, single phase distribution is shown in figure 1. This configuration, installed by utilities, allows correct billing by monitoring current only in the phase wire. However, this is not enough to bill correctly if popular tampering schemes are in place. This example uses a current transformer as the transducer on the phase current path.

A popular approach to designing a tamper resistant energy meter monitors current in both the phase and return path. Monitoring both phase and neutral and calculating real average power based on the larger of the two currents eliminates most pilfering schemes that tamper with the current path through the energy meter. A mechanical meter or an electronic meter with a single current transducer is unable to detect power consumption of the load in the configuration shown in figure 2, which illustrates blatant tampering that is easy to detect with visual inspection.

Fig 3: Improper connection billed correctly

Figure 3 illustrates a more subtle approach. All connections to the meter are correct but not all of the current supplied to the load is returned through the meter. A popular tactic that is difficult to detect is to reduce the size of one’s bill by creating a partial earth fault. This illustration uses two current transformers that are fairly well matched to eliminate the need for calibration of the second current channel. The meter bills according to the larger of the phase or neutral currents.

This type of simple tampering scheme can result in loss of income for power generation and distribution companies when implemented on high current loads. However, the cost of installing a meter capable of reliably detecting differences in phase and neutral currents at very low currents is probably unwarranted. Electronic energy meter manufacturers have been designing these systems with multiple integrated circuits. The multiplexers and comparators used in these schemes increase component count and are not able to bill accurately under a fault condition.

The AD7751 integrates this functionality onto a single chip to eliminate switching and threshold noise while reducing component count. A fault is indicated when the phase and neutral currents differ by more than 12.5%. Billing is continued using the larger of the two currents. The lowest cost meter requires manual reading of a mechanical counter. The AD7751 drives the stepper motor counter directly to facilitate the lowest cost design.